Legal Products and Political Configuration in Post-Amendment Indonesia: Narratives, Actors, and the Influence of the Digital Society

  • Muhammad Wahdini Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Habibi Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Noor Shaleh Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Indonesia
Keywords: Legal Products, Political Configuration, Amendments, Digital Society

Abstract

This research discusses the dynamic relationship between political configuration, the character of legal products, and the role of the digital society in Indonesian legal politics post the Fourth Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Two classical views on the relationship between law and politics, between law as a social controller and law as a product of societal dynamics, serve as a foundation for understanding contemporary realities. Mahfud MD's findings on the relationship between political configuration and the character of legal products indicate that political changes have direct consequences on the orientation of the regulations that emerge. However, this study highlights that the current political configuration is no longer solely determined by elites and formal structures, but also by a new force: the digital society. The emergence of actors such as influencers, online activists, and political buzzers marks a shift in the way the public participates and influences the course of legislation. On the other hand, the open digital space also presents threats in the form of polarization, disinformation, and digital oligarchy. Through a qualitative approach and literature study, this research finds that Indonesia's legal politics today are becoming increasingly complex, full of challenges, but also hold new hope for broader and more meaningful public participation. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of adaptive legal reforms, paying attention to digital dynamics, and strengthening media ethics as part of the Indonesian legal political ecosystem that upholds decency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya, Z. F. (2019). Romantisme Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia: Kajian Atas Konstribusi Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(1), 37–54.

Aichholzer, G., & Rose, G. (2020). Experience with digital tools in different types of e-participation. European E-Democracy in Practice, 93–140.

Alvin, S. (2022). Komunikasi politik di era digital: dari big data, influencer relations & kekuatan selebriti, hingga politik tawa. Deepublish.

Arifin, M. (2022). Membangun Konsep Hukum Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility) Melalui Pendekatan Kesejahteraan Sosial. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).

Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of information and communication technologies on democratic processes and citizen participation. Societies, 15(2), 40.

Azmi, S. (2014). Pelaksanaan Amandemen Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Likhitaprajna, 16(2), 14–26.

Bourchier, D. M. (2019). Two decades of ideological contestation in Indonesia: From democratic cosmopolitanism to religious nationalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 713–733.

Budhiati, I. (2020). Mahkamah Konstitusi dan kepastian hukum pemilu: Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap UUD NRI Tahun 1945 untuk kepastian hukum pemilu. Sinar Grafika.

Budianto, A. (2016). Pembangunan Politik Hukum Pasca Reformasi Di Indonesia. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.

Butt, S. (2014). The position of international law within the Indonesian legal system. Emory Int’l L. Rev., 28, 1.

Freedman, A., & Tiburzi, R. (2012). Progress and caution: Indonesia’s democracy. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 39(3), 131–156.

Frenki, F. (2023). Politik hukum dan perannya dalam pembangunan hukum di indonesia pasca reformasi. ASAS, 3(2).

Gardbaum, S. (2014). Are strong constitutional courts always a good thing for new democracies. Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 53, 285.

Hadi, S. (2015). Pengaruh Konfigurasi Politik Pemerintah Terhadap Produk Hukum. Addin, 9(2).

Halperin, S., & Heath, O. (2020). Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.

Harefa, D., & Fatolosa Hulu, M. M. (2020). Demokrasi Pancasila di era kemajemukan. Pm Publisher.

Hendrianto, S. (2016). The rise and fall of heroic chief justices: constitutional politics and judicial leadership in Indonesia. Wash. Int’l LJ, 25, 489.

Hermanto, B., Ibrahim Nur, A., & Subawa, M. (2024). Indonesia parliamentary reform and legislation quality backsliding phenomenon: case of Indonesia post reformasi. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 12(1), 73–99.

Hisyam, M. (2025). Krisis masa kini dan orde baru. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Hutagalung, M. P. (1999). Reformasi UUD 1945 Melalui Konvensi Ketatanegaraan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 29(4), 335–349.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, S. H. (2021). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Mahfud, M. (1998). Politik hukum di Indonesia. Lp3s.

Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study (Vol. 2, Issue 7). The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods.

Noor, F. (2012). Institutionalising Islamic political parties in Indonesia: A study of internal fragmentation and cohesion in the post-Soeharto era (1998-2008). University of Exeter (United Kingdom).

Pradana, M. D., Argenti, G., & Adiarsa, S. R. (2023). Analisis Framing mengenai Pemberitaan Buzzer Politik di Media Sosial pada Media Online detikcom. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 5736–5747.

Pratama, A. A. (2024). ARAH POLITIK HUKUM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN: PROGRESIFITAS ATAU FORMALITAS? BUNGA RAMPAI POLITIK HUKUM PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN, 16.

Ratnaningsih, E. (2016). Perubahan Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 4(1).

Rusfiana, Y., & Kurniasih, D. (2024). The Role of Civil Society Organizations in Promoting Social and Political Change in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(3), 187–207.

Santoso, T., & Budhiati, I. (2021). Pemilu di Indonesia: kelembagaan, pelaksanaan, dan pengawasan. Sinar Grafika.

Soekanto, S. (1985). Perspektif Teoritis Studi Hukum dalam Masyarakat.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351.

untuk Diskusi, B. G., & Binawan, A. A. L. (2020). POST-TRUTH: USAI DAN USANGNYA KEBENARAN HUKUM? Menemukan Kebenaran Hukum Dalam Era Post-Truth, 169.

Unver, H. A. (2017). Digital challenges to democracy: Politics of automation, attention, and engagement. Journal of International Affairs, 71(1), 127–146.

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2002). Hukum: Paradigma, metode dan dinamika masalahnya. Jakarta: Elsam Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat.

CROSSMARK
Published
2025-06-28
DIMENSIONS
How to Cite
Wahdini, M., Habibi, A., & Shaleh, M. N. (2025). Legal Products and Political Configuration in Post-Amendment Indonesia: Narratives, Actors, and the Influence of the Digital Society. Contemporary Society and Politics Journal, 4(1), 36–51. Retrieved from https://ejournal.iainkerinci.ac.id/index.php/cspj/article/view/5678