Omerta And Its Implications For Eradication Of Criminal Acts Of Corruption: Integration Of Maqasid Sharia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32939/islamika.v23i2.3126Keywords:
Omerta, Corruption Crimes, Maqasid ShariahAbstract Corruption is an extraordinary crime that has a systemic impact on social life, the nation, and the state. So the eradication process requires extraordinary measures. However, 24 years after the promulgation of the Corruption Eradication Law, criminal statistics show that corruption crimes are still high. This recorded is only a small part of the criminal acts of corruption that have not been criminally processed. Among the causal aspects is the legal system, especially legal substance. That was by disharmonization of these laws shows that there is an opportunity for the tradition of omerta by the perpetrators, namely the legitimacy of formal legal norms that replace Herziene Indlandsch Reglement. By another side of Islamic law criminal acts of corruption have an impact on the basic of worldly life as well as safety in the afterlife. So this research aims to provide a solution to eradicating criminal acts of corruption and elaborate on the Islamic legal system. The type of research was normative juridical with a qualitative approach by secondary data and meta norms regarding the Corruption Eradication Law and the Criminal Procedure Law. Research findings show that the culture of omerta occurs due to disharmonization of norms between the Corruption Eradication Law and Article 56 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law which gives suspects or defendants the right not to answer questions from law enforcement officials at any stage. inspection. Then the omerta of criminal acts of corruption also contradicts the concept of maqasid sharia.
Downloads
References
Ade Pranata. (2022). The miracle of anti-corruption efforts and regional fiscal independence in plugging budget leakage: evidence from western and eastern Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(10), e11153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11153
Adhari, A. (2018). Konstitusionalitas Materiele Wederrechtelijk Dalam Kebijakan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i2.260
Adriana Nicole Cerami. (2009). the Mafia’S System of Silence in Communication, Film and Literature: Perversions of Society and Transgressions of Omertà.
Agustina, S. (2015). Asas Lex Specialist Derogat Legi Generaly Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana (Themis Boo).
Alex O. Acheampong ; Elliot Boateng ; Corllins Baah Annor. (2024). Do corruption, income inequality and redistribution hasten transition towards (non)renewable energy economy? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 68(February 2023), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.11.006
Anisah Alfada. (2019). The destructive effect of corruption on economic growth in Indonesia: A threshold model. Heliyon, 5(10), e02649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02649
Beatriz Simon-Yarza Corresponding. (2023). The Changing Wheels Hypothesis . Corruption and Development : Evidence from China Author : Beatriz Simon-Yarza Corresponding author : Beatriz Simon-Yarza. Journal of Government and Economics, 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2023.100094
Boge Triatmanto ; Suryaning Bawono. (2023). The interplay of corruption, human capital, and unemployment in Indonesia: Implications for economic development. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2(September), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100031
Dwi Seno Wijanarko; Irman Jaya. (2021). Kedudukan Miranda Rules Dan Penegakan Hukumnya Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.59635/jihk.v8i2.160
Efendi, R. (2018). Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Melakukan Penuntutan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Imiah Syariah IAIN Batusangkar, 1.
Efendi, R., Adhari, A., Raus, A., & Aryani, F. D. (2023). The Reversal of the Burden of Proof ; Between Presumption of Innocence and Presumption of Guilt. 8(June).
Efendi, R., Zurnetti, A., & Sukmareni, S. (2023). Indonesia’s Revocation of Political Rights: Criminal Perspectives Philosophy. Nagari Law Review, 6(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.6.i.2.p.120-132.2023
Elwi Danil. (2014). Korupsi, Konsep, Tindak Pidana dan Pemberantasannya. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Faezy Adenan, A. A. R. (2018). Keamanan Negara Menurut Perspektif Maqāsid Syariah. Jurnal Wasatiyyah Malaysia, 1(January), 7–30.
Farhan, M. dkk. (2020). Implementasi Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 Pada Pengadilan Agama Sawahlunto. Jurnal Imiah Syariah IAIN BatusangkarJurnal Ilmiah SYariah, 19(2), 245–263.
Finta Riris Sitorus. (2016). Pelanggaran Pengaturan Prinsip Miranda Rule Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Revista CENIC. Ciencias Biológicas, 152(3), 28. file:///Users/andreataquez/Downloads/guia-plan-de-mejora-institucional.pdf%0Ahttp://salud.tabasco.gob.mx/content/revista%0Ahttp://www.revistaalad.com/pdfs/Guias_ALAD_11_Nov_2013.pdf%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v66n3.60060.%0Ahttp://www.cenetec.
Friedmann, L. M. (2011). The Legal Sistem. A Social Science Perspektive. Nusamedia.
https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi/penanganan-perkara. (n.d.).
Is, S. M. dan S. (2020). Hukum Ketenaga Kerjaan di Indonesia. Kencana.
Klein, B., Mullard, S., Ahamadi, K., Mara, P., Mena, J., Nourdine, S., Rakoto, M., Tombozandry, D., & Maraina, A. V. (2023). (Re)Interpreting corruption in local environments: Disputed definitions, contested conservation, and power plays in Northern Madagascar. Political Geography, 107(September), 102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102973
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2023). Statistik Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Profesi/Jabatan.
Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidan Korupsi. (2023). Statistik Tindak Pidana Korupsi Inkracht.
Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (2023a). Statistik Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Instansi.
Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (2023b). Statistik Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Jenis Perkara.
Lawrence M. Friedman. (2002). American Law in the 20th Century. In NBER Working Papers. Yele University New Haven London. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16019
Lupo, S. (2015). Mafia ’ s Ideology. Italian and Italian American Studies Book Series (IIAS).
M. Sofyan Lubis. (2010). Prinsip Miranda Rule Hak Tersangka Sebelum Pemeriksaan. Pustaka Yustisia.
Mario Puzo. (2002). Omerta. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Maulidar, M. (2021). Korelasi Filosifis Antara Restorative Justice dan Diyat Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Muamalah, 13, 143–155.
Muchamad Ali Safa’at. (2016). Konsep Hukum H.L.A. Hart. Konstitusi Press.
Muhammad Farhan, dkk. (2020). Implementasi Suart edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 Pada Pengadilan Agama Sawahlunto.
Olena Andriyenko. (2019). Omertà As a Worldview Phenomenon of the Italian Mafia. Paradigm of Knowledge, 4(36). https://doi.org/10.26886/2520-7474.4(36)2019.2
Oluseye, O. (2023). Exploring Potential Political Corruption in Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects in Nigeria. Journal Pre-Proof, 118159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100108
Roni Efendi. (2016). Kedudukan Masa Tunggu Eksekusi Bagi Terpidana Mati Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan. Andalas.
Roni Efendi. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Pemberantasan Tradisi Omerta Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia (Hebby Rahmatul Utamy (Ed.)). Deepublish Publisher.
Shinta Agustina, D. (2015). Obstuction of Justice Tindak Pidana Menghalangi Proses Hukum Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi. Themis Books.
Suntana, I., Rusliana, I., Asdak, C., & Gazalba, L. (2023). Ideological distrust: re-understanding the debate on state ideology, normalization of state-religion relationship, and legal system in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(3), e14676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14676
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, (1981).
Wahyu Rizki Pratama. (2022). Application of the Principle of Miranda Rule for Legal Aid Assistance in Criminal Cases for Poor People in Indonesia in accordance with Law No. 16 of 2011. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 3(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v3i2.66015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Roni Efendi, Hebby Rahmatul Utamy, Dewi Putri, Arifki Budia Warman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
