Exploring the Similarities and Differences among the Kinds of Curriculum Implemented in Indonesian Schools
Abstract This paper explores the similarities and differences among the kinds of the curriculums such as the School-Based Curriculum, 2013 Curriculum and the Freedom to Learn Curriculum that have been implemented in Indonesian schools. Their similarities and differences comprise the conceptual or theoretical frameworks, the instructional procedures and the assessment at schools in Indonesia. The curriculum as a determinant of educational success must be responsive to all contemporary challenges and innovations. The 2013 Curriculum and the Freedom to Learn Curriculum, the so called “Merdeka curriculum” are currently being implemented. The Indonesian government has adjusted the changes to the curriculum as much as possible to meet the educational goals expected in this digital era. The objective of this article is to compare the kinds of the implemented curriculums in Teaching English as A Foreign Language (TEFL) based on the basic frameworks, targeted competencies, curriculum structure, learning, assessment, teaching tools, and curriculum tools.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, I. (2014). Pengembangan Kurikulum (Teori dan Praktek). Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo.
Aditomo, A. (2022). Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Celce-Murcia,M., Dornyei, Z., and Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics,6 (2), 5-3. Heinle & Heinle, – An International Thomson Publishing Company, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Curriculum Planning and Research Division. 2001. English Language Syllabus 2001 for Primary and Secondary School. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Dardjowidjojo, S. (2000). English teaching in Indonesia. EA Journal, 18 (1), 22-30
Depdiknas. 2005. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas Republik Indonesia.
Dubin, F. and Olshtain, E. (1986) .Course Design - Developing Programs and Materials for Language Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk Guru. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
Freeman, D.L. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levacic, R. (1995). Local management of schools: Analysis and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
McDonough, J., and Shaw, C. (1993). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nunan, David. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Heinle & Heinle – An International Thomson Publishing Company: Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://www.academia.edu/6000603/Permendikbud_No_70_Tahun_2013_Tentang_Kerangka_Dasar_dan_Struktur_Kurikulum
Yul, W., Andrian, R., Musthofa, A., & Fitri Rozianie, J. (2022). Assessing Arabic Speaking Skills: A Critical Study for Implementation of Final Examination in Indonesia. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v5i2.22294
Yulia, Yuyun. (2013). Teaching challenges in Indonesia: Motivating students and teacher’s classroom language. pdfs.semanticscholar.org.
Copyright (c) 2023 The Progress: Journal of Language and Ethnicity
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
