Pengembangan Modul Pedoman Guru dalam Mendesain Instrumen Penilaian Matematika Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Matematika

  • Antok Kurniawan Universitas Jambi
  • M Rusdi Universitas Jambi
  • Jefri Marzal Universitas Jambi
Keywords: Guidance module, Assessment instrument, Mathematical problem-solving

Abstract

This study aims to determine the process, specifications, and teacher's perception of developing a teacher guidance module in making mathematical assessment instruments based on mathematical problem-solving. This study uses the Research and Development method which is used to produce certain products, namely teacher guidance modules. The development model used in this study is the development model that Marshall et al. (2009), Tryon and Bishop et al (2012) and Rusdi (2018) combined by researchers into references. The steps consist of the problem and need analysis, literature review, product design, validity, practitioner trials. The research subjects in this development were two validators consisting of material expert validators, instrument design expert test validators, and five practitioners. The type of data taken in this study is qualitative data. The instrument used in the study was an open questionnaire. The process stages in developing are (a) Analysis of problems and needs, (b) literature review, (c) product design, (d) validity, (e) trial practitioners. The product specifications developed in the module are that there are three chapters on introduction, concepts, and procedures accompanied by examples by using types of problem-solving, namely problem-solving design and story problem. Teacher's perception in the teacher guidance module is positive, of the five practitioners recommending that it be used as a guide in making problem-solving problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach.Department of Educational Psychology and the Instructional Technology University of Georgia. USA: Springer.

Habibi, M. (2014). Analisis Kinerja Guru Matematika dari Sudut Pandang Siswa. Jurnal Educationist, 7(1), 69-74

Jonassen, H.D, (2011). Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem – Solving Learning Environments. New York and London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Jonassen, H.D, (2004). Learning to Solve Problems An Instructional Design Guide. United States of America: Pfeiffer A Wiley Imprint.

Yasemin, K, & Şengül, S. (2016). Developing the Rubric for Evaluating Problem Posing (REPP). International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 8 (1), 8-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2016.01.002.

Lantas, G. (2004). Matematika, Materi Pelatihan Penilaian Alternatif, Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Marshall, J.C, Julie, S & Robert M.H. (2009). The Design And Validation Of Equip: An Instrument to Assess Inquiry-Based Instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 299-321.

Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo (2016). Perbaikan Instruksional Dalam Implementasi Assessment-Based Learning di Kelas Matematika, Cakrawala Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 36(3), 403-411. http://10.21831/cp.v35i3.8821.

Rusdi, M. (2018). Penelitian Desain dan Pengembangan Kependidikan ( Konsep, Prosedur dan Sintesis Pengetahuan Baru. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suurtamm, C. et. al (2016). .Assesmemt in Mathematics Education: Large-Scale Assessment and Classroom Assessment. Humburg: Springer Open.

Zainul, Asmawi. (2005). Tes dan Asesmen di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
CROSSMARK
Published
2019-05-14
DIMENSIONS
How to Cite
Kurniawan, A., Rusdi, M., & Marzal, J. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Pedoman Guru dalam Mendesain Instrumen Penilaian Matematika Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v2i1.259