Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
Abstract The establishment of Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Religious Courts has increased the authority of religious courts, namely by resolving disputes from the sharia economy. Parties to the dispute can take a path that can be resolved, namely by litigation and non-litigation. There are several ways through non-litigation, such as mediation, negotiation, arbitration, and musharawah. However, the focus of this discussion is on mediation. Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court in article 1 point 1 states that mediation is one way to resolve disputes by negotiating to obtain agreement from two parties which will be assisted by a mediator. The necessity in conducting this mediation is a provision of article 10 of PERMA SES. This provision states that judges are required to seek peace first before hearing cases. Mediators in court have a vital role in the dispute resolution process from two parties Provide facilities for dialogue, neutrality, provide agreement facilities, encourage legal compliance, confidentiality, good communication skills, make agreements, stages of the mediation process, the first to fill out the form. Both parties may choose a mediator who is submitted to the judge. The initial stage in the mediation process is to provide a resume with a maximum of five days calculated to the mediator. Furthermore, the mediator mediates with negotiation material at an unlimited mediation meeting, both posita and petitum lawsuit, The mediation process takes place within thirty days calculated from the determination to carry out mediation, can be extended again for thirty days with the agreement of two parties. If within thirty days there is no sign of successful mediation, the process can be stopped immediately. If the mediation process has been carried out by the mediator and two parties, then the mediator will draw conclusions from mediation
Downloads
References
Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2019). ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA YANG EFEKTIF, EFISIEN DAN BERKEADILAN BAGI PERBANKAN SYARIAH. LITIGASI, 20. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v20i2.1069
Ahmad, Z., Sastrawati, N., & Sinilele, A. (2021). PERANAN MEDIATOR DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH DI PENGADILAN AGAMA MAKASSAR. 2.
Aswar, A., Kara, M. H., & Taufiq, N. (2021). Pelaksanaan Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah pada Pengadilan Agama Makassar. Al-Azhar Islamic Law Review, 3(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.37146/ailrev.v3i1.59
B, R. S., & Fariana, A. (2017). Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Yang Efektif Dikaitkan Dengan Kompetensi Di Peradilan Agama Dalam Rangka Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Nasional. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 7(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v7i1.4361
Dwi Rezki Sri Astarini. (2013). Mediasi pengadilan. PT Alumni.
Fauzi, N. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Berbasis Sulh (Damai) untuk Mencapai Keadilan. JURNAL HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH, 1(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.30595/jhes.v1i2.3922
Hanifah, M. (2021). PERBANDINGAN TUGAS MEDIATOR PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DENGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.134
Hardiati, N., Widiana, S., & Hidayat, S. (2021). Model-Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis dan Keuangan, 1(5), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v1i5.80
Hidayat, M. R., & Komarudin, P. (2020). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WAKAF MELALUI JALUR LITIGASI DAN NON-LITIGASI. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 11(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v11i2.1936
Ilmi, F., & Mujib, A. (n.d.). OPTIMALISASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH MELALUI MEDIASI.
Khalid, H., & Rustam, P. K. (n.d.). Efektifitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Mediasi.
Mamik. (2014). Metodologi Kualitatif. Zifatama Publisher.
Muri, Y. (2017). Metode Penelitian, Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan Metode Gabungan. Kencana.
Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016.pdf. (n.d.).
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bandung. (n.d.).
Rahman, A. . (2021). PENDEKATAN SULH DAN MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF TERBAIK PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i2.2488
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Cipta Media Surabaya.
Retnowulan, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata. CV Mandar Maju.
Saifullah, M. (2009). Mediasi Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Wali Songo Press.
Sari, M., & Asmendri, A. (2020). Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. Natural Science, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.15548/nsc.v6i1.1555
Subiarti, D. W. (2017). Peran Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Sleman. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol2.iss2.art8
Sudiarto. (2015). Negosiasi, mediasi, dan arbitrase penyelesaian sengketa alternatif di Indonesia. Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantiatif Dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Syufaat, S. (2018). Penerapan Prosedur Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf di Pengadilan Agama. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 1(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i1.1678
Triana, N. (2019). URGENSITAS MEDIATOR DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH di PENGADILAN AGAMA PURBALINGGA. LAW REFORM, 15(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i2.26184
Yunita, A. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Mediasi Pada Masa Pandemi di Pengadilan Agama Wilayah Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art10
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Miftahul Ikhsan, Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas , Ramdani Wahyu Sururie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.