Respon Ulama dan Dokter terhadap Hukuman Kebiri Kimia  Bagi Pelaku Pedofilia

Ali Minanto; Elfia Elfia

doi:10.32694/qst.v20i2.2291

Ali Minanto Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
Elfia Elfia Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v20i2.2291

Keywords: Chemical Castration, Child Protection Law, Doctor, Moslim Scholar, Pedophile

Abstract

This study is intended to see the response of moslim scholar and doctors to the article on chemical castration in The Child Protection Law in Indonesia. Muslim scholars and doctors are considered to represent the two main groups responding to that law. In this case, moslim scholar responds from the legal side, while the doctor responds from the application side. This study uses a socio-legal approach in looking at the urgency of the chemical castration and the community's response to it. Data was collected through interviews, observation and document study. This study shows that the article on chemical castration had indeed received a rejection response from various groups, including religious scholars and doctors. This study shows that the moslim scholar basically do not reject, but just state that this type of chemical castration is not found in Islamic legal literature. However, scholars still agree with the implementation of this punishment because it can be categorized as ta'zir. As for the response from doctors, it is hoped that the executors of this punishment will not be from them, because it would be contrary to the doctor's code of ethics, but from those usually assigned by the state for this purpose. Hence, the response from the clergy and doctors who were previously considered to be opposed could be compromised and lead to the common maslahah.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arake, L. (2020). Hukuman Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam, 5(1), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.35673/ajmpi.v5i1.676

BBSTV. (2019). Efek Yang dirasakan Penerima Kebiri Kimia.

Dahwir, A., & Barhamudin, B. (2021). Penerapan Sanksi Kebiri Kimia Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Seksual Terhadap Anak. Jurnal Solusi, 19(3), 302–320.

Davison, G. C. (2010). Psikologi Abnormal, Edisi 9. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Etriyal. (2023). Wawancara Tanggapan Dokter terhadap Kebiri Kimia.

Hasanah, N. H., & Soponyono, E. (2018). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Sanksi Kebiri Kimia dalam Perspektif HAM dan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 7(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2018.v07.i03.p03

Hiariej, E. O. (2016). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana.

Hutapea, M. R. M. (2020). Penerapan Hukuman Tindakan Kebiri Kimia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v3i1.2931

Ilyas, S. (2015). Sanksi Kebiri Kimiawi Bagi Pelaku Pedofilia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. Al-Mursalah, 1(2), 54–62.

INews TV. (2019). Dokter Boyke Tolak Hukuman Kebiri Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual.

Kartika, A. P., Rizal Farid, M. L., & Nandira Putri, I. R. (2020). Reformulasi Eksekusi Kebiri Kimia Guna Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Bagi Tenaga Medis/Dokter Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Pedophilia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art7

Kartono, K. (2009). Psikologi Normal dan Abnormalitas Seksual. Mandar Maju.

KODEKI. (2012). Pengurus Besar Ikatan Dokter Indonesia.

Marbun, P., & Husodo, J. A. (2021). Hukuman Kebiri Bagi Pelaku Pedofilia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Res Publica, 5(1), 86–97.

Mardiya, N. Q. (2017). Penerapan Hukuman Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(1), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk14110

Maulana, R., & Rochmani, R. (2022). Ryan Maulana Hukuman Kebiri Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak (Pedofilia) Berdasarkan UU Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum, 23(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v23i2.9081

MH, A. H., & Syamsudin, R. (2020). Pandangan Hukum Islam Terahadap Sanksi Hukum Kebiri Dalam UU No. 17 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perlindungan Anak. Qadauna, 01.

Muladi. (1990). Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Materiil Indonesia di Masa Datang.

Prodjodikoro, W. (1989). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Eresco.

Refri, N. (2023). Tanggapan Dokter terhadap Kebiri Kimia.

Sadarjoen, S. S. (2005). Bungai Rampai Kasus Gangguan Psikoseksual. Refika Aditama.

Semiun, Y. (2006). Kesehatan Mental. Kanisius.

Setiyawan, Y. (2017). UU No 35 Tahun 2014 Perubahan UU No 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak. 1–14.

Sihotang, G. C. D., Warman, E., Yunara, E., & Ikhsan, E. (2022). Penjatuhan Pidana Tambah Kebiri Kimia Terhadap Predator Anak Pada Putusan No.69/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Mjk. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 1(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i3.65

Soesilo, R. (2013). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal. Politeia.

Soetedjo, S., Sundoro, J., & Sulaiman, A. (2018). Tinjauan Etika Dokter sebagai Eksekutor Hukuman Kebiri. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 2(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.26880/jeki.v2i2.18

Sonya Liandu Hakim. (2023). Wawancara Tanggapan Dokter terhadap Kebiri Kimia. 7 Februari 2023.

T, P. (2005). Politik hukum pidana: kajian kebijakan kriminalisasi dan dekriminalisasi.

Yudesman. (2012). Hak Dan Kewajiban Asasi Manusia ( Sebuah Telaah Dengan Pendekatan Alqur’an Dan Hadits ). Al-Qisthu, 07, 45–87.

Yusyanti, D. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Korban dari Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 619. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.619-636

Alvarino (Dokter Urologi RSI Siti Rahmah Padang) Wawancara 20 Desember 2022.

CNN Indonesia. Hukuman Kebiri Kimia. http://youtu.be/42ifoDb1NZ4 diakses Tanggal 6 November 2022.