Aplikasi Metode Chaid dalam Menganalisis Kecendrungan Penelitian Skripsi Mahasiswa pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
Abstrak This study aims to identify, analyze and map the results of students’ research on mathematics education in 2015-2018. This research used the CHAID algorithm that consists of 3 steps ie merging, splitting and stopping steps. The results of this research were (1) In 2015-2018, 51,9% of the students’ research used the classroom action research and 48,1% else used the descriptive, the analysis and the experiment. (2) 14,1% of the students used media for teaching and learning and 3,7% of them did not. (3) 8,1% were individual research and 5,9% were a collaboration or team research. (4) While the level of school and subject taught in schools did not effect the trend of student research.
Unduhan
Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Referensi
Brameld, T. (1999). Dasar Konsep Pendidikan Moral. Jakarta: Alfabeta.
Gallagher, C. A. (2000). An Iterative Approach to Classification Analysis. Tersedia di www.casact.org/library/ratemaking/90dp237.pdf (diakses tanggal 12 Februari 2017)
Kunto, Y.S. & Hasana, S. N. (2006). Analisis CHAID Sebagai Alat Bantu Statistika Untuk Segmentasi Pasar, Jurnal Manajemen, 1(2).
Lehmann, T. & Eherler, D. (2001), Responder Profiling with CHAID and Dependency Analysis. Tersedia di www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~ml/ecmlpkdd/WS-Proceedings/w10/lehmann.pdf (diakses 9 Januari 2017)
Manulang. (2004). Pedoman Teknis Menulis Skripsi, Yogyakarta: Andi Offset
Padmini, I. A. S, dkk. (2012). Analisis waktu Kelulusan Mahasiswa dengan Metode CHAID. E-Jurnal Matematika Jurusan Matematika Universitas Udayana, 1(1), 89-93
Permana, H. (2011). Klasifikasi Dengan Metode CHAID dan Penerapannya pada Klasifikasi Alumni FMIPA UNY. Yogyakarta: Skripsi FMIPA-UNY.
Prahmana, R.C.I. (2017). The Role of Research-Based Learning to Enhance Students’ Research and
Academic Writing Skills.Journal of Education and Learning. 11(3), 351-366.
Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: Fakultas Sastra UNS.
White, R. (1997). Trends Research in Science Education, 27(2), 215-221.
Gallagher, C. A. (2000). An Iterative Approach to Classification Analysis. Tersedia di www.casact.org/library/ratemaking/90dp237.pdf (diakses tanggal 12 Februari 2017)
Kunto, Y.S. & Hasana, S. N. (2006). Analisis CHAID Sebagai Alat Bantu Statistika Untuk Segmentasi Pasar, Jurnal Manajemen, 1(2).
Lehmann, T. & Eherler, D. (2001), Responder Profiling with CHAID and Dependency Analysis. Tersedia di www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~ml/ecmlpkdd/WS-Proceedings/w10/lehmann.pdf (diakses 9 Januari 2017)
Manulang. (2004). Pedoman Teknis Menulis Skripsi, Yogyakarta: Andi Offset
Padmini, I. A. S, dkk. (2012). Analisis waktu Kelulusan Mahasiswa dengan Metode CHAID. E-Jurnal Matematika Jurusan Matematika Universitas Udayana, 1(1), 89-93
Permana, H. (2011). Klasifikasi Dengan Metode CHAID dan Penerapannya pada Klasifikasi Alumni FMIPA UNY. Yogyakarta: Skripsi FMIPA-UNY.
Prahmana, R.C.I. (2017). The Role of Research-Based Learning to Enhance Students’ Research and
Academic Writing Skills.Journal of Education and Learning. 11(3), 351-366.
Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: Fakultas Sastra UNS.
White, R. (1997). Trends Research in Science Education, 27(2), 215-221.
CROSSMARK
Diterbitkan
2019-11-04
DIMENSIONS
Cara Mengutip
Hasibuan, E. A., & Harahap, A. N. (2019). Aplikasi Metode Chaid dalam Menganalisis Kecendrungan Penelitian Skripsi Mahasiswa pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika. Edumatika, 2(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v1i2.247
Bagian
Artikel
