Pandangan Hakim tentang Pengasuhan Bersama dalam Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian

Muhammad  Andyansyah Sembiring; Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip

doi:10.32939/islamika.v25i2.6617

Authors

Muhammad Andyansyah Sembiring Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32939/islamika.v25i2.6617

Abstract

This study examines the views of judges at the Religious Court of Medan regarding the concept of shared parenting after divorce. The issue arises because a sole custody pattern often leads one parent to evade responsibility, thereby disadvantaging the child. The objective of this research is to determine whether shared parenting can serve as a more appropriate alternative in ensuring the best interests of the child. The study employs a normative–empirical method with approaches drawn from sociology of law, legal psychology, and legal studies. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with judges of the Religious Court of Medan, while secondary data were derived from statutory regulations, the Compilation of Islamic Law, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. Data were analyzed using an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that judges generally consider shared parenting to be consistent with the principles of justice and the best interests of the child, as it allows the involvement of both parents. However, its implementation remains limited due to the absence of explicit normative regulation, resulting in reliance on judicial discretion or the agreement of the parties. In conclusion, shared parenting has gained substantive acceptance among judges and holds potential for further development within Islamic family law in Indonesia, supported by regulatory frameworks or technical guidelines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Zuhaili, W. (2011). Fiqh Islam Wa Adillatuhu (Terj. Abdul Hayyi al-Kattani) (9 ed.). Gema Insani.

Asnawi, M. N. (2019). Penerapan Model Pengasuhan Bersama (Shared Parenting) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak. Al Iqtishadiyah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 5(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.31602/iqt.v5i1.2143

Baihaqi, F. A. (2023). Variasi Putusan Hadhanah di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Maqasid Syar’iah dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak [Tesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2019). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai masalah hukum kontemporer. 3(2).

Carpenter, J. T., & Taussing, J. G. (1979). Joint custody. 56(2).

Djaya, S. M. (1996). Adopsi (Pengangkatan Anak) dalam Yurisprudensi. Tarsito.

Faisal, A. (2023). Progressive legal thought Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo. 1(2).

Gushairi, M. (2020). Konsep shared parenting dalam hadhanah pasca perceraian: Kajian perundang-undangan perkawinan Islam kontemporer. 20(2).

Jauhar, M. A. (2021). Konsepsi Pengasuhan Bersama Terhadap Hak Asuh Anak di Bawah Umur (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Gedong Tataan No. 0334/PDT.G/2019/PA.GDT) [Skripsi]. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

KHI. (1991). Instruksi Presiden RI Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Penyebarluasan KHI. Sekretariat Negera.

Kruk, E. (2008). Child Custody, Acces and Parental Responsibility (Vol. 56). The University of British Coumbia.

Maulana, M. I., & Safitri, M. I. (2024). Pemberian hak asuh bersama dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak asuh anak di Indonesia: Perspektif maslahah mursalah. 13(2).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2910 K/Pdt/2017, 2910 K/Pdt/2017 Putusan Mahkamah Agung (2017). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/ Perkara perdata

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Namlea Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Nla, 137/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Nla Putusan Mahkamah Agung (2025). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/ Sengketa hadhanah

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Purworejo Nomor 55/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Pwr, 55/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Pwr Putusan Pengadilan Agama (2025). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/ Perkara hadhanah

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Pandan Nomor 250/Pdt.G/2025/PA.TDN, 250/Pdt.G/2025/PA.TDN Putusan Mahkamah Agung (2025). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/ Perkara hadhanah

Putusan Yurisprudensi Hakim, Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung (2007). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/ Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia

Rizani, R. (2020). Sosial hukum dalam pandangan Eugen Ehrlich: Sebuah teori ‘living law.’ Eugen Ehrlich, Living Law 2.

Sabila, A. I., Musfiroh, M. R., & Rosyada, A. (2025). Analisis putusan hak asuh anak bersama pasca perceraian: Perspektif Kongres Ulama Perempuan Indonesia (KUPI). 9(1).

Supriyadi, F. M., Putra, R., Achmad, M. M., & Syahuri, T. (2025). Pokok pikiran dan sumbangsih fundamental Gustav Radbruch terhadap perkembangan ilmu dan hukum. 7(1).

Turner, D. P. (2020). Sampling methods in research design. Headache (Blackwell Publishing Inc.).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak (2014).

Yusoff, R. M., Hartini, & Ilhami, H. (2024). Sole custody and the implication of fault-based divorce under the Indonesian legal system. 9(1).

Zainal, M. (2025). Analisis Teoritis Peran Psikologi Hukum Dalam Mengungkap Motif Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses Peradilan di Indonesia: Analisis Teoritis Peran Psikologi Hukum Dalam Mengungkap Motif Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses Peradilan di Indonesia. Justness : Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Agama, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.61974/justness.v5i1.84