The School Teachers’ Creativity and Self-efficacy in Writing an Academic Text: A Rasch-Based Survey Analysis

Authors

  • Herri Mulyono Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32939/tarbawi.v19i1.2370

Keywords:

Academic Text, Academic Writing Creativity, Rasch-Based Analysis, School Teachers, Self-Efficacy

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the academic writing creativity and self-efficacy of Indonesian school teachers. Under a survey design, a five-point Likert scale of Academic Writing Creativity and Self-Efficacy (ACSE) questionnaire was distributed to school teachers in Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi, of whom 262 voluntarily completed it. Rasch analysis was conducted on the quantitative data, with the results showing that almost half of Indonesian school teachers possess a low level of academic writing creativity and self-efficacy (N = 112, or 48.7%), some with a moderate level (N = 88, or 38.3%), and a few with a high level (N = 30, or 13%). Although teachers were found to have a strong ability to seek feedback on their writing from their colleagues and to make decisions about whether to accept or reject it, they lacked creativity in their academic writing, particularly their skill to express original ideas using a wide range of words and expressions in a grammatically correct manner. Moreover, their competence in utilizing technology for writing resources and assistance, such as researching pertinent literature, referencing accurately, paraphrasing effectively, and addressing spelling and other language errors, was limited. A discussion of the findings was presented in the article, and recommendations were offered regarding further academic writing training and research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, T. A. (1994). Using multidimensional Item Response Theory to understand what items and tests are measuring. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0704_1

Allison, D. (2004). Creativity, students’ academic writing, and EAP: exploring comments on writing in an English language degree programme. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.11.005

Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008

Antara, I. M. A. R., Sedeng, I. N., & Putra, P. A. A. (2016). Keterampilan menulis wacana argumentasi Berbahasa Inggris dengan Metode ESA (Engage, Study, Active) pada Mahasiswa level post-Intermediete di STIE Tratmia Mulya. Linguistika, 23(44), 37–43.

Arono, & Arsyad, S. (2019). The effect of genre-based mentoring on rhetorical quality of research article drafts by Indonesian lecturers in social sciences and humanities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 33–50. https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2019_3_3.pdf

Arsyad, S., & Arono. (2016). Potential problematic rhetorical style transfer from first language to foreign language: a case of Indonesian authors writing research article introductions in English. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2016.1153642

Arsyad, S., Ramadhan, S., & Maisarah, I. (2020). The rhetorical problems experienced by Indonesian lecturers in social sciences and humanities in writing research articles for international journals. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 116–129.

Chan, M., & Subramaniam, R. (2020). Validation of a science concept inventory by Rasch analysis. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Rasch Measurement: Applications in Quantitative Educational Research (Issue July, pp. 159–178). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3_9

Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2020). Rasch models in the analysis of repgrid data. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 33, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1852461

Ekawati, A. D., Mulyono, H., Arrummaiza, V. S., Zulaiha, S., & Ningsih, S. K. (2021). Evaluating EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and attitude towards web-based professional development practices: A Rasch analysis. TESOL International Journal, 16(6.1), 124–141.

Evans, K. (2013). Pathways through writing blocks in the academic environment. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-242-6

Flowerdew, J., & Habibie, P. (2022). Introducing English for research publication purposes. Routledge.

Husin, M. S., & Nurbayani, E. (2017). The Ability of Indonesian EFL learners in writing academic papers. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(2), 237–250.

KemenPan-RB. (2009). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi nomor 16 tentang jabatan fungsional guru dan angka kreditnya. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi, Republik Indonesia.

Kristiawan, M., Nipriansyah, N., Yanti, F. A., & Viona, E. (2022). Penulisan dan publikasi penelitian tindakan kelas bagi guru. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 95–101.

Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2020). Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers’ pedagogical initiatives. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002

Li, Y., Flowerdew, J., & Cargill, M. (2018). Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes to science students in China: A case study of an experienced teacher in the classroom. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.006

Luji, D. S., Tari, E., Syahputra, A. W., & Taneo, J. (2022). Pendampingan penulisan artikel penelitian tindakan kelas di Sabu Raijua. Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(5), 1155–1159.

Maamuujav, U., Olson, C. B., & Chung, H. (2021). Syntactic and lexical features of adolescent L2 students’ academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100822

Mitchell, K. M., McMillan, D. E., Lobchuk, M. M., Nickel, N. C., Rabbani, R., & Li, J. (2021). Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES). Assessing Writing, 48, 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524

Mulyono, H., & Artarini, S. (2021). Direct and indirect supports in an EFL academic writing classroom: New rehtorical genre perspective. MEXTESOL Journal, 45(4), 1–6. http://mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=26511

Mulyono, H., Ningsih, S. K., Fausia, F., & Setiawan, H. (n.d.). Developing an academic writing creativity and self-efficacy among TVET instructors: Evaluating an online genre analysis-based academic writing workshop.

Mulyono, H., Ningsih, S. K., & Raufi, B. S. (2023). Validating the academic writing creativity and self-efficacy Scale: A Rasch Model analysis. Indonesian Research Journal in Education|, 7(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v7i1.24789

Mulyono, H., Saskia, R., Arrummaiza, V. S., & Suryoputro, G. (2020). Psychometric assessment of an instrument evaluating the effects of affective variables on students’ WTC in face-to-face and digital environment. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1823617. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1823617

Mulyono, H., & Suryoputro, G. (2020). The use of social media platform to promote authentic learning environment in hgiher education setting. Science for Education Today, 10(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.07

Ningsih, S. K., Mulyono, H., Ar Rahmah, R., & Fitriani, N. A. (2021). A Rasch-based validation of EFL teachers’ received online social support scale. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1957529. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1957529

Sanjaya, I. N. S., Sitawati, A. A. R., & Suciani, N. K. (2015). Comparing hedges used by English and Indonesian scholars in published research articles: A corpus-based study. TEFLIN Journal Journal, 26(2), 209–227.

Siburian, J., Sadikin, A., & Hamidah, A. (2022). Penelitian tindakan kelas: Sebuah kewajiban bagi guru. Jurnal JUPEMA, 1(1), 35–40.

Teng, M. F., & Wang, C. (2023). Assessing academic writing self-efficacy belief and writing performance in a foreign language context. Foreign Language Annals, 56, 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12638

Zulaiha, S., & Mulyono, H. (2020). Exploring junior high school EFL teachers’ training needs of assessment literacy. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1772943. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1772943

Downloads

Published

2023-06-12