Pelatihan Penerapan Model RHOMI (Realistic And Holistic Mathematics Integration) Bagi Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Di Smpn 8 Kota Sungai Penuh
Abstract
This community service program aimed to enhance teachers’ competencies in implementing mathematics instruction oriented toward the development of students’ critical thinking skills through training on the RHOMI (Realistic and Holistic Mathematics Integration) model. The program was conducted at SMPN 8 Kota Sungai Penuh using a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, positioning teachers as active participants throughout all stages of the program, including planning, action, observation, and reflection. The PAR approach was selected to ensure that the training was participatory, contextual, and sustainable, in line with teachers’ actual classroom needs. The results indicated an improvement in teachers’ understanding of realistic and holistic mathematics learning, as well as a shift in instructional practices from procedural teaching toward more dialogical, reflective, and critical-thinking-oriented learning. Teachers were able to design RHOMI-based instructional materials that integrated real-life contexts with mathematical concepts in a coherent manner. Furthermore, the program fostered collaboration and reflective practices among teachers. Therefore, the PAR-based RHOMI training proved to be an effective community service strategy for improving the quality of mathematics instruction and enhancing students’ critical thinking skills
Downloads
References
Baum, F., MacDougall, C., & Smith, D. (2016). Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 70(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206447
Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Integrating problem-based learning into mathematics instruction: A study on problem-solving skills. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383162
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002
Cahill, C. (2020). Participatory action research and practice. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5, 411–435.
Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2019). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2014). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research (3rd ed.). Corwin Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Solution Tree Press.
Fauzan, A., Plomp, T., & Gravemeijer, K. (2022). Developing mathematics education theories through design-based research: Contributions to realistic mathematics education. Educational Design Research, 6(2), 1–24.
Fitriani, N., & Sulastri, S. (2024). Pelatihan guru berbasis pembelajaran inovatif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pengabdian Pendidikan, 9(1), 45–54.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Hadi, S., & Kasum, M. U. (2022). Realistic mathematics education and students’ critical thinking skills: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 189–202.
Hasanah, U., & Widodo, S. A. (2021). Penguatan kompetensi pedagogik guru melalui kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat berbasis lesson study. Jurnal Abdimas, 25(2), 134–142. Julie, H., Sanjaya, F., & Anggo, M. (2018).
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in mathematics through classroom discourse. Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/499658
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Laporan hasil asesmen nasional. Jakarta: Kemdikbudristek.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
Laksmiwati, H., Suyanto, S., & Sudarmin, S. (2019). Pelatihan pembelajaran berbasis HOTS bagi guru SMP sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat IPTEKS, 5(2), 89–97.
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2020). How does realistic mathematics education improve students’ mathematical cognitive achievement? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 1–14.
Lehrer, R., & Romberg, T. (1996). Exploring children’s data modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 69–108. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_3
Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2018). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 32(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1377225
Mulyono, D., Kartono, K., & Rochmad, R. (2022). Program pengabdian berbasis pendampingan guru untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Abdimas Unnes, 6(1), 67–76.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
Nugroho, A. A., & Widodo, S. A. (2020). Profil kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran matematika. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 33–44.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Pratiwi, I., & Rahayu, W. (2023). Mathematical critical thinking skills of Indonesian students based on PISA framework. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 755–772.
Putra, R. Y., & Suryadi, D. (2023). Holistic mathematics learning to enhance students’ critical and reflective thinking. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 5(1), 21–35.
Rahmawati, Y., & Anwar, Y. S. (2021). Teacher professional development for 21st century learning: A systematic review. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 457–470.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2013). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sagor, R. (2010). Collaborative action research for professional learning communities. Solution Tree Press.
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. NCTM.
Stacey, K. (2018). Mathematics education for citizenship: Reflections on PISA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(2), 109–123.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Suryadi, D. (2019). Pembelajaran matematika dan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Bandung: UPI Press.
The role of realistic mathematics education in developing students’ higher order thinking skills. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 241–252.
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher collaboration. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2020). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(3), 327–349.
Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Supporting mathematics teachers to develop context-based learning through professional development programs. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1–14.
